I should probably begin by admitting straight-away the persuasions of my bias: I’m a fully committed THATCamp evangelist after this, my second THATCamp experience.
THATCampSE was held on the campus of Emory University, March 4-6, 2011.
I attended the Pedagogy BootCamp session on Friday. There was also a Programming track and a Project track. The Pedagogy session was hosted by representatives of Emory’s ECIT, which is a robust, pedagogically informed, technologically equipped center designed to facilitate faculty implementation of new technologies in the classroom. I was very, very impressed by ECIT, its mission, and its staffers. The Pedagogy track was slightly awkward in that we had very disparate level of experience represented in the participants. What made the session worthwhile though was the conversation that developed over the course of the morning session, which I think reached into the ideas and concerns of most of the participants. The afternoon session was a little more relaxed, as we considered web presence for academics through a variety of platforms. I can’t speak to the Project track’s experience at all. But I did hear from some friends in the Programming track that it was a little over most people’s heads. In retrospect, it might have been nice to have had a track that fell somewhere in between the Pedagogy and Programming tracks in terms of required technical savvy. (This might be exactly what the Project track was–as I said, I didn’t hear any feedback on that particular BootCamp session for some reason.)
The Sessions I attended Saturday:
The first session I attended on Saturday had to do with digital images. A major topic of conversation was permissions and Fair Use. I personally think that academics (and particularly journal editors) need to get more aggressive about asserting the right to Fair Use of images in our noncommerical works. It’s clear that Fair use is culturally-legally defined, and not strictly legally defined. We are ceding too many opportunities for Fair Use.
During the second session I hacked a nap on the sixth floor of the library. Emory students beware, when you nap on the library couches, Emory faculty take pictures of you with their camera phones and laugh at you later. I’m just sayin’.
The third session on Saturday that I attended dealt with software that can help make archive visits and file organization in general more efficient. We learned about some excellent tools, like Hazel, that I hadn’t known about previously.
[DATA MISSING] For the fourth session I hacked another nap at the hotel (Damn you, Georgian Terrace! [not where I stayed, BTW]).
The sessions I attended on Sunday:
The first session I attended dealt with crowdsourcing, broadly conceived, and we simply had a very rich conversation about different crowdsourcing strategies, with an emphasis on the classroom and crowdsourcing teaching in a variety of ways.
The last session I attended, during the last time slot of the unconference, dealt with faculty/librarians relationships. Working relationships. Miriam Posner has a great post on the session. Basically, there aren’t good social or institutional forums for faculty and librarians to collaborate, which costs both groups. This session created some of the liveliest conversation I witnessed over the weekend. We didn’t come up with any solutions though. I think we might have over thought it. If you’re a faculty member, you simply need to walk down to the library, buy your subject librarian a cup of coffee, and have a friendly, collegial chat about each of your projects. Then repeat. GRAD STUDENTS: MAKE FRIENDS WITH YOUR RESEARCH LIBRARIANS. I never did, and in retrospect, it was probably one of the worst mistakes of my graduate career. As a faculty member, I’m now going to be going out of my way to make friendly with subject librarians, just as I do with fellow faculty.
All in all, a wonderful conference, and my deepest gratitude goes out to the people who organized it. They know who they are, and I thank them.
Despite my THATCamp evangelism, I still have concerns about the digital humanities. I still don’t think it’s a discipline, and that we need to tread more warily in some respects. Our scholarship, I still contend, must be *better* than scholarship that doesn’t fall under the digital humanities confederacy (“confederacy of disciplines,” instead of “discipline”) if it is to gain credible wide acceptance (more quickly than it might otherwise–wide acceptance is inevitable, for the pixels are on the wall, so to speak).
Important Twitter hashtags from the weekend:
#thatcamp, #tigerblood, #thatcamp_puppy, #slothblood, #digimpact, #winning
The weekend was further enriched by ridiculous and unwarranted Charlie Sheen references, which added an absurd poetry to many of the backchannel #thatcamp tweets. #thatcamp #winning #owlblood
Ian, the picture is for you:
With the winter break and the holidays it has taken me nearly a two months to get to this post! But, since the THATCamp movement seems to be carrying a full head of steam , it seems worth posting a somewhat belated reflection upon my own first THATCamp experience. In December I attended THATCampVA, hosted by the University of Virginia‘s Scholars’ Lab, which itself lives inside Alderman Library.
One thing the THATCamp experience made me realize even more acutely is the value of academic units like the Scholars’ Lab, which link technologists with academics. I’m lucky to have worked in a similar lab at UT Austin, the Digital Writing and Research Lab (DWRL), which is similar, though focused more exclusively upon the concerns of a single discipline, rather than a host of disciplines, which is what UVA’s Scholars’ Lab serves.
My first THATCamp experience was invigorating, but also exhausting. I attended the Friday BootCamp, and attended a session on using Geographic Information Systems. I have a distant background in GIS from my undergrad days and previous, albeit short lived, career, and the BootCamp session was a great refresher, and a great introduction to the more sophisticated elements of what current GIS software is capable of. It was nice to attend a session on a technology for its own sake, without being entirely clear in my own mind on how I might use that technology down the road. This allowed me to play during the session, which is how I tend to learn new interfaces best–when I’m not too focused on immediate goals, which tend to suck the fun out of things.
Saturday and Sunday the sessions began, and without getting too far into the nitty gritty, it was a tumult, in a good–no, great–way. For me the greatest value of the experience was simply conversing with intelligent people OUTSIDE OF MY OWN DISCIPLINE about a host of topics of general interest. We get so locked into our disciplinary identities, and yet, when we meet people completely outside of our own disciplines, it can be hard to break the intellectual ice and connect in a meaningful way. In my limited experience, this is the greatest value of the THATCamp experience, semi-structured conversation with very smart people who I otherwise never would have had the opportunity to meet. It really was that simple, and that valuable, for me. I especially liked the absence of formal goals or presentations, which allowed the unconference to take the form of almost pure brainstorming and intellectual cross-pollination. This is where things became exhausting–it takes a lot of energy to talk to new people about new ideas for 8-12 hours a day. I left exhausted, but in that most pleasing way.
In March I’ll attend my second THATCamp event, THATCampSE, at Emory University. It will be my first time on the Emory campus and I look forward to meeting a mostly new crowd (new to me, that is) of digital humanists, and catching up with a few of my new friends from THATCampVA. I’ll be working especially hard to recruit people into getting their classes to contribute to the very newly launched Rural Image Cooperative, which my grad class in Visual and Digital Rhetorics has begun to build.
My one regret about the THATCampVA experience is that I was too tired Saturday evening to stick around for the “vintage pan-Asian surf and garage rock” of Dzian. Next time.
About a month ago I had the chance to visit two (one and two) very good friends in Detroit. They, along with another a friend of mine here at WCU who is originally from Detroit, have frequently bemoaned the genre of Detroit blight porn that has been spearheaded by The New York Times. Surely enough, Detroit faces more than its fair share of economic and related real estate woes. But those woes go back much further than the current economic crisis.
More to the point though, my first ever visit to Detroit left me entirely wowed. I had amazing BBQ at Slow’s, and wonderful red flannel hash for “blunch” at The Fly Trap, to name just two of many phenomenal and gluttonous dining experiences that were crammed into the four day trip. I was stunned by the collection at the Detroit Institute of Art Museum, even though I only had time to take in a sliver of the museum. And everywhere my Detroit hosts and I went it was obvious that artists of all varieties are using the deflated real estate prices in Detroit to undertake great projects and risks that wouldn’t be possible in other environments.
One of the oldest of these art projects is the Heidelberg Project (do yourself a favor and surf around the project’s website). The project spans several city lots, and is named after the street where the project resides. “Project” becomes a loaded word, for the economic crisis journalist-pornographers would certainly call the neighborhood a “project” in the pejorative sense, even though it has never really been a federal housing project. But “project” of course really refers to the art project that the space has become, a site of re-used and recycled objects juxtaposed in ways simultaneously macabre, profound, and whimsical. See my photo of a crucified stuffed rabbit below. Stuffed animals like these are nailed up everywhere, to trees and abandoned houses, slowly mildewing and melting in the midwestern winters and rains. Shopping carts sit in and atop trees. A painted boat is filled to overflowing with more stuffed animals. A lawn mower sits atop a massive pile of discarded shoes. Inorganic garbage is repurposed everywhere.
I was pretty much completely smitten by the project, and almost had to be dragged away by my camera strap. But in addition to my love for the ridiculousness and randomness and audacity of the project, I have to appreciate it also for how it reinvigorated in my own mind some longstanding quandaries of mine. As a once avid photographer (whose interest in creating, and not just critiquing, photography has been reinvigorated by a photographer friend recently), I’ve always been troubled by how difficult it is to capture the scale and detail of an event such as the Heidelberg Project. Details are easy, but capturing the “whole picture” is a bitch. In anticipation of THATCampVA (THATCamp_SouthEast is now accepting applications too), I’ve been wondering what digital interface-gizmos I might down the line develop in order to try to represent such a massive project in photos. I have no concrete ideas, let alone solutions, yet. But something is definitely in the digital fermenting vat.
All in all, a great trip to Detroit, and one that, due to the sheer volume and visibility and audacity of its art projects, I will be mulling over for a long time. It was great to see friends and to get the opportunity to meet some of their colleagues working in rhetoric and composition in the Wayne State Department of English. Unfortunately, one of the rhet/comp folks I didn’t have a chance to meet was Richard Grusin, whose book Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11 I have since read, and which I found to be completely-and-completely badass. I highly recommend it to any rhetoricians interested in the digital humanities, and am already finding some applications for his theory of premediation in my own work.